1) What was the biggest surprise for you in
the reading?
I
learned an abundant amount from this reading. I think what surprised me the
most is that there is a large emphasis on competition in the business world. Incumbents
have an advantage when it comes to competing with new entrants, and I think it
is interesting how the article describes the way competition influences threat
of entry, power of suppliers, power of buyers and threat of substitutes.
2) Identify at least one part of the reading
that was confusing to you.
The
thing that confused me about the reading was figuring out what incumbency
meant. I looked up incumbency in the dictionary, and it didn’t seem like a
definition that matched the context of the word in the sentence. Finally, I
found out the meaning of the word through Investopedia.
3) If you were able to ask two questions
to the author, what would you ask? Why?
If
I could ask the author two questions, it would be:
a) Why
is there always competition in the market?
I
would ask this question because I don’t understand why companies always compete
against each other to be the top company. It would be more ethical to let all
companies win instead of trying to dominate the market.
b) What
are the government regulations for competition?
This
is a great question because I am sure there are many laws and acts for competition.
I have read about the Sherman Antitrust Law in Marketing class, and that law
protects competition among companies.
4) Was there anything you think the author was
wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
No,
there is nothing I think the author was wrong about.
No comments:
Post a Comment